Difference between revisions of "HS-PS2-1"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| CC1 = | | CC1 = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
== {{Connectionsheading}} == | == {{Connectionsheading}} == | ||
{{connectionsmessage}} | {{connectionsmessage}} | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| MATH1 = | | MATH1 = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | --> | |
{{Pagecontributors}} | {{Pagecontributors}} | ||
Revision as of 09:36, 1 April 2025
Analyze data to support the claim that Newton’s Second Law of Motion describes the mathematical relationship among the net force on a macroscopic object, its mass, and its acceleration.
Clarification statement: Examples of data could include tables, graphs, or diagrams (vector diagrams) for objects subject to a net unbalanced force (a falling object, an object sliding down a ramp, an object being acted on by friction, a moving object being pulled by a constant force, projectile motion, or an object moving in a circular motion), for objects in equilibrium (Newton’s First Law), or for forces describing the interaction between two objects (Newton’s Third Law).
Assessment boundary: Assessment is limited to macroscopic objects moving at non-relativistic speeds whose measured quantities can be classified as either vector or scalar.
Note: this is a NYSED-specific performance expectation that is different from the Next Generation Science Standards.
Resources
Examples and discussion of resources for the learning, teaching, and assessment of HS-PS2-1.
This section could be expanded upon. You can help out by adding to this section.
Assessment
What assessment of HS-PS2-1 might look like on a NY state exam.
This section could be expanded upon. You can help out by adding to this section.
NGSS Dimensions
Performance expectation HS-PS2-1 was developed using the following elements from the NRC document A Framework for K-12 Science Education: