HS-ESS3-2 | Resource Use and Conservation · NYS standard · Regents questions

From NY Science Standards Wiki
Revision as of 09:33, 18 October 2026 by Conrad (talk | contribs) (PLD table: abbreviate question labels to match the questions-by-performance-level pages (e.g. "Aug 2026 · Q14"))

Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.

Clarification statement: Emphasis is on the conservation, recycling, and reuse of resources (such as minerals and metals) where possible, and on minimizing impacts where it is not. Examples include developing best practices for agricultural soil use, mining (for coal, tar sands, and oil shales), and pumping (for petroleum and natural gas). Science knowledge indicates what can happen in natural systems—not what should happen.

Regents Exam Questions

Released New York State Regents exam questions that assess HS-ESS3-2 are listed here by exam and question cluster. Each link opens the question with its answer key.

Exam Cluster Question
August 2026 Earth and Space Sciences Regents Carbon Emissions in Industry Question 27
June 2026 Earth and Space Sciences Regents Iceland Hotspot Question 4
January 2026 Earth and Space Sciences Regents Rubber Ducks and Pacific Ocean Trash Question 9
Mined and Mineral Resources of New York State Question 17
Energy and Mineral Resources Question 43
August 2025 Earth and Space Sciences Regents The Power of Water Question 10
Dams and Flood Mitigation Question 36
June 2025 Earth and Space Sciences Regents Mining and Use of Lithium Question 31

Vocabulary

Terms from the Earth & Space Science Glossary that come from this standard or from the released exam questions that assess it.

From this standard
  • agricultural soil use
  • argument
  • coal
  • competing design solutions
  • conservation
  • constraints
  • cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics
  • cost-benefit ratios
  • costs and benefits
  • design solution
  • energy and mineral resources
  • minerals
  • mining
  • natural gas
  • natural resources
  • natural systems
  • new technologies
  • oil shales
  • petroleum
  • recycling
  • resource extraction
  • reuse
  • social, cultural, and environmental impacts
  • sustainability
  • tar sands
From released exam questions

Performance Level Descriptions

Every Regents exam question on HS-ESS3-2 is written to match one of the performance level descriptions (PLDs) below.

Level 1: Given a design solution, identify the benefit(s)/costs of developing or managing or utilizing energy or (mineral) resources. Jan 2026 · Q17 Aug 2025 · Q36 Aug 2025 · Q10
Level 2: Evaluate given design solutions for developing or managing or utilizing energy or (mineral) resources based on cost‐benefit ratios. Aug 2026 · Q27 June 2025 · Q31
Level 3: Evaluate competing design solutions for developing or managing, or utilizing energy or (mineral) resources based on cost-benefit ratios. June 2026 · Q4 Jan 2026 · Q43 Jan 2026 · Q9
Level 4: Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
Level 5: Design a solution for developing, managing, and utilizing energy or mineral resources based on cost‐benefit ratios taking into consideration social, ethical, environmental, or geopolitical issues.

Resources

Examples and discussion of resources for the learning, teaching, and assessment of HS-ESS3-2.

Pixel beaver This section could be expanded upon. You can help out by adding to this section.


NGSS Dimensions

Performance expectation HS-ESS3-2 was developed using the following elements from the NRC document A Framework for K-12 Science Education:

Science and Engineering Practices
  • Engaging in argument from evidence: Evaluate competing design solutions to a real-world problem based on scientific ideas and principles, empirical evidence, and logical arguments regarding relevant factors (e.g. economic, societal, environmental, ethical considerations).
Disciplinary Core Ideas
  • Natural resources: All forms of energy production and other resource extraction have associated economic, social, environmental, and geopolitical costs and risks as well as benefits. New technologies and social regulations can change the balance of these factors.
  • Developing possible solutions: When evaluating solutions, it is important to take into account a range of constraints, including cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics, and to consider social, cultural, and environmental impacts.
Crosscutting Concepts
  • Influence of Engineering, Technology, and Science on Society and the Natural World: Engineers continuously modify these systems to increase benefits while decreasing costs and risks
  • Influence of Engineering, Technology, and Science on Society and the Natural World: Analysis of costs and benefits is a critical aspect of decisions about technology.
  • Science Addresses Questions About the Natural and Material World: Science and technology may raise ethical issues for which science, by itself, does not provide answers and solutions.
  • Science Addresses Questions About the Natural and Material World: Science knowledge indicates what can happen in natural systems—not what should happen. The latter involves ethics, values, and human decisions about the use of knowledge.
  • Many decisions are not made using science alone, but rely on social and cultural contexts to resolve issues.
Page contributors: Conrad Richman, Caroline Leonard
Earth and Space Science | HS. Human Sustainability